International Research Journal of Commerce , Arts and Science

 ( Online- ISSN 2319 - 9202 )     New DOI : 10.32804/CASIRJ

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 61    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

DECONSTRUCTIVE INSIGHT TO ANALYZE YEATS' POETRY

    2 Author(s):  DR. ASHOK KUMAR , DR.SANEH LATA

Vol -  5, Issue- 8 ,         Page(s) : 149 - 152  (2014 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/CASIRJ

Abstract

As we move from Eliot's early to later poetry, we trace a change from the poetry of the persona to the poetry of the poet. From "Ash-Wednesday" onwards, the poet comes in his proporiapersona to state what he so far has said in the persons of others. Eliot has already in "Traditionand the Individual Talent" said, "only those who have personality andemotions know what it means to want to escape from these things."1 To make personal emotions impersonal, one needs to have what we like but of what we ought to like, Eliot comes to posit in "Religion and Literature". The two kinds of "having" is attained when we need to be acutely aware of what we like and what we ought to like at once,' they are not only different but also the same. The first means knowing what we really feel ; the second involves understanding our shortcomings. The two forms of self-consciousness, Eliot adds, knowing what we are and what we ought to be, must go together.

  1. Abrams, M.H., The Mirror andthe Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical'Tradition. London: OxfordUniversity Press, 1953.
  2. Antrim, Harry. T.S.Eliot's Concept of Language.Gainsville: University of FloridaPress, 1971.
  3. Barthis, Roland. Elements of Semiology, tr. Annette Lavas and Colin Smith.New    York: Hill and Wang, 1968.
  4. Beehler, Michael, T.S.Eliot, Wallace Stevens and the Discourse of Difference.Baton Rouge: LouisianaStateUniversity Press, 1989.
  5. Bhalla, M.M., ed. T.S. Eliot (proceedings of seminar organised by  Congress forCultural Freedom) Bombay: P.C. Manektala& Sons, 1965.
  6. Bolgan, Anne.   What the Thunder Really Said   Montreal: McGill Queen's University Press, 1973.
  7. Bradley, F.H. Essays on Truth and Reality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1914.
  8. Brooks, Cleanth,  "The WasteLand: Critique of the Myth." A Collection OfCritical Essays of 'The Waste Land"ed. JayMartin.New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1968.
  9. Burns, Gerald, Modern Poetry and the Idea of Language.  New Haven: YaleUniversity Press, 1969.
  10. Cooper, John Xiros, T.S. Eliot and the Ideology of Four Quartets. Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity Press, 1995.
  11. Culler, Jonathan, Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Studyof Literature.Ithaca: CornellUniversity Press. 1973.
  12. Davidron, Hariet, T.S. Eliot andHermenuetics: Absence and Interpretation in  The WasteLandBaton Rouge: LouisianaState 1985.
  13. Drew, Elizabeth, T.S. Eliot:  The Design of his Poetry. Delhi: Doaba, 1993.
  14. Forester, Norman and Falks, Robert, ed. American Poetry and Prose.  Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1957.
  15. Freed, Lewis,  T.S.Eliot: The Critic as Philosopher.  West Lafayette: PurdueUniversity Press, 1979.
  16. Freud, Sigmond, Civilization and its Discontents, tr. James Strachey. New York: W.W. Norton and Co., Inc., 1961.
  17. Frye, Northrop,  T.S. Eliot: An Introduction.  Chicago: University of ChicagoPress, 1981.
  18. Hayward, John, Selected Prose. London: Penguin Books, 1953.
  19. Hogg, James, ed. The Eire and the Rose.Will Jure: Antony Rowe Ltd., 1996.
  20. Howarth, Herbert, Figures Behind T.S. Eliot, Chatto&Windus, 1965.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details